Skip to main content

An independent, nonpartisan information resource — not affiliated with the U.S. government or any campaign.

Does the Decision of the Chair Stand as the judgment of the Senate that amdt. no. 2360 does not violate section 313(b)(1)(E) of the CBA?

June 30, 2025 · On the Decision of the Chair

Fetterman voted: Nay

Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on this measure. On this vote, Fetterman voted with the majority of the Senate Democratic caucus. The final result was Decision of Chair Sustained (53–47).

What this vote was about

In the nature of a substitute.

How the parties split

CaucusYeaNay
Democrats045
Republicans530
Independents02

Primary source

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote — 119th Congress, Session 1, Vote No. 330.

View the official record on Senate.gov →

Questions & answers

How did Fetterman vote on Does the Decision of the Chair Stand as the judgment of the Senate that amdt. no. 2360 does not violate section 313(b)(1)(E) of the CBA??
Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on Does the Decision of the Chair Stand as the judgment of the Senate that amdt. no. 2360 does not violate section 313(b)(1)(E) of the CBA? on June 30, 2025. The measure’s outcome was: Decision of Chair Sustained.
Did Fetterman vote with his party on this?
Yes. On this vote Fetterman voted with the majority of Senate Democrats.

Related Procedural & other votes votes