Motion to Table Schumer Amdt. No. 1373
December 12, 2023 · On the Motion to Table
Fetterman voted: Nay
Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on this measure. On this vote, Fetterman voted with the majority of the Senate Democratic caucus. The final result was Motion to Table Failed (47–53).
What kind of vote this was
This was a vote on a motion to table, which sets the underlying question aside; agreeing to it defeats the question in practice. Approval required a simple majority.
What this vote was about
To modify the effective date.
How the parties split
| Caucus | Yea | Nay |
|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 0 | 48 |
| Republicans | 47 | 2 |
| Independents | 0 | 3 |
In total, 100 senators voted on this question. The question was decided by a margin of 6 votes. Senate Democrats split 0–48 and Republicans 47–2. Independents split 0–3. Fetterman’s Nay was one of 48 cast by Senate Democrats.
Primary source
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote — 118th Congress, Session 1, Vote No. 339.
This vote in Fetterman’s record
This site groups the vote under Defense, military & veterans. Across 169 votes in that cluster, Fetterman voted Yea 76 times and Nay 67 times, and broke with the Democratic caucus majority on 45 of them (26.6%).
Questions and answers
- How did Fetterman vote on Motion to Table Schumer Amdt. No. 1373?
- Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on Motion to Table Schumer Amdt. No. 1373 on December 12, 2023. The measure’s outcome was: Motion to Table Failed.
- Did Fetterman vote with his party on this?
- Yes. On this vote Fetterman voted with the majority of Senate Democrats.
Related Defense, military & veterans votes
- Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Proceed to S. 4784 Did not vote
- Motion to Proceed to the House Message to Accompany S. 1318 Yea Party break
- Is the Point of Order Well Taken Re: The Privilege Status of S.J.Res. 124? Yea Party break
- Confirmation: Lt. Gen. Joshua M. Rudd to be General in the United States Army Yea Party break
- Motion to Invoke Cloture: Lt. Gen. Joshua M. Rudd to be General in the United States Army Yea Party break
- Is the Point of Order Well Taken Re: To the Privilege Status of S.J. Res. 98 Nay