S. 316
March 29, 2023 · On Passage of the Bill
Fetterman voted: Did not vote
Senator John Fetterman did not vote on this measure. Fetterman did not cast a vote on this question. The final result was Bill Passed (66–30).
What kind of vote this was
This was a passage vote — a vote on whether the Senate approves the bill itself. Approval required a simple majority.
What this vote was about
A bill to repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.
How the parties split
| Caucus | Yea | Nay |
|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 45 | 0 |
| Republicans | 18 | 30 |
| Independents | 3 | 0 |
In total, 96 senators voted on this question. The question was decided by a margin of 36 votes. 4 senators did not vote. Senate Democrats split 45–0 and Republicans 18–30. Independents split 3–0. Fetterman was among the 4 senators who did not vote.
Primary source
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote — 118th Congress, Session 1, Vote No. 77.
This vote in Fetterman’s record
This site groups the vote under Defense, military & veterans. Across 169 votes in that cluster, Fetterman voted Yea 76 times and Nay 67 times, and broke with the Democratic caucus majority on 45 of them (26.6%).
This is one of the 204 roll calls Fetterman has missed since January 2023, about 12.9% of all recorded votes.
Questions and answers
- Did Fetterman vote for S. 316?
- Senator John Fetterman did not vote on S. 316 on March 29, 2023. The measure’s outcome was: Bill Passed.
- Did Fetterman vote with his party on this?
- Fetterman did not cast a vote on this question.
Related Defense, military & veterans votes
- Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Proceed to S. 4784 Did not vote
- Motion to Proceed to the House Message to Accompany S. 1318 Yea Party break
- Is the Point of Order Well Taken Re: The Privilege Status of S.J.Res. 124? Yea Party break
- Confirmation: Lt. Gen. Joshua M. Rudd to be General in the United States Army Yea Party break
- Motion to Invoke Cloture: Lt. Gen. Joshua M. Rudd to be General in the United States Army Yea Party break
- Is the Point of Order Well Taken Re: To the Privilege Status of S.J. Res. 98 Nay