Skip to main content
An independent, nonpartisan information resource — not affiliated with the U.S. government or any campaign. Here’s how you know

Primary-sourced. Every vote on this site is drawn directly from the U.S. Senate’s official roll-call records at senate.gov, and each vote links back to that source.

Nonpartisan. This site presents the factual record without endorsement or advocacy. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with Senator Fetterman, his office, or any political organization.

Fetterman Voting Record Independent · Nonpartisan · Primary-sourced
118th Congress Roll call 5 S.J.Res.32 Labor & Economy

Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding?

January 10, 2024 · On Overriding the Veto

Fetterman voted: Nay

Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on this measure. On this vote, Fetterman voted with the majority of the Senate Democratic caucus. The final result was Veto Sustained (54–45).

What this vote was about

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)".

How the parties split

CaucusYeaNay
Democrats344
Republicans490
Independents21

Primary source

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote — 118th Congress, Session 2, Vote No. 5.

View the official record on Senate.gov

Questions & answers

How did John Fetterman vote on Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding??
Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding? on January 10, 2024. The measure’s outcome was: Veto Sustained.
Did Fetterman vote with his party on this?
Yes. On this vote Fetterman voted with the majority of Senate Democrats.