Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding?
January 10, 2024 · On Overriding the Veto
Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on this measure. On this vote, Fetterman voted with the majority of the Senate Democratic caucus. The final result was Veto Sustained (54–45).
What this vote was about
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)".
How the parties split
| Caucus | Yea | Nay |
|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 3 | 44 |
| Republicans | 49 | 0 |
| Independents | 2 | 1 |
Primary source
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote — 118th Congress, Session 2, Vote No. 5.
View the official record on Senate.govQuestions & answers
- How did John Fetterman vote on Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding??
- Senator John Fetterman voted Nay on Shall the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 32) Pass, the Objections of the President of the United States to the Contrary Notwithstanding? on January 10, 2024. The measure’s outcome was: Veto Sustained.
- Did Fetterman vote with his party on this?
- Yes. On this vote Fetterman voted with the majority of Senate Democrats.
Related Labor & Economy votes
- H. J. Res. 142 Nay
- Motion to Proceed to H. J. Res. 142 Nay
- Motion to Proceed to S. J. Res. 95 Yea
- Confirmation: Luke Lindberg, of South Dakota, to be Under Secretary of Agriculture for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs Yea
- Motion to Invoke Cloture: Luke Lindberg to be Under Secretary of Agriculture for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs Yea
- Confirmation: Casey Mulligan, of Illinois, to be Chief Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business Administration Nay